We’re quite pleased with the new version 2 release of User Profile Manager, but of course there are new features being planned already. (Note that going forward, the name User Profile Manager will be dropped, and future versions will carry the name “Profile management” or Pm.)
Without going into details, we’re looking at features to improve both performance and usability. What does that mean for current users of Pm, though, and what provision should they make as they roll out their v2 deployments to minimise the disruption when versions 3 and 4 come along?
First of all, there’s the design of the User Store. If you’re using Windows XP and/or Windows 2003, you’ll be using “version 1” profiles, and if you’re using Windows Vista or Windows 2008, you’ll be using “version 2” profiles. That’s Microsoft’s terminology, but it can get really ambiguous when I’m also talking about Pm versions, so I’ll refer to Windows XP and Windows 2003 profiles as Win5 profiles. Likewise Windows Vista and Windows 2008 profiles can be grouped under the term Win6 profiles. As an aside, it’s looking like Windows 7 profiles share the same format as Vista and 2008, so at the time of writing, it looks like Windows 7 is also covered by the term Win6.
So what we’re expecting is that you’ll put both your Win5 and Win6 profiles on the same server, and we expect that you’ll set up your User Store as suggested by Microsoft’s article http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc757013.aspx (Security Recommendations for Roaming User Profiles Shared Folders). For the sake of example, let’s say you have the User Store set up as the share //OutlawSrv1/profiles/ . Pm lets you configure paths using Active Directory attributes, so you might use either #cn# or #sAMAccountName# to define the next level. Again, for the sake of example, let’s use #cn#, giving us a path of //OutlawSrv1/profiles/#cn#/ . If we do this, all the different Pm directories we’re going to create will just inherit the permissions from the top level directory, which is exactly what we want.
Now we recommend setting up a System Environment variable to differentiate between Win5 and Win6 profiles at the next level. Pm lets you incorporate System Environment variable into the profile path, by enclosing the variable in percent signs. In our example, we’ll set up a System Environment variable %ProfileVer% which will take the value “v1” on Windows XP and Windows 2003 systems and “v2” on Windows Vista and Windows 2008 systems. So now the complete path you configure in the Pm GPO is //OutlawSrv1/profiles/#cn#/%ProfileVer%/
Here is the User Store layout that results:
Sorry if that’s a bit long winded, but it’s important to understand that this is the basis of our planning for the next versions of Pm. We’re going to assume that new features will be able to slot in alongside the v1 and v2 directories above, so that Pm v3/v4 will build per-feature data on the directory structure above, giving:
That’s the first recommendation. If you’re only interested on how to future-proof your Pm installation against future Pm feature updates, you can stop reading here.
The next recommendations are about how you might manage upgrade scenarios. Typically, you’ve got Pm v2 deployed, and you’d like to take advantage of the new features in Pm v3 or Pm v4. Unfortunately, we don’t expect to be able to offer co-existence of different Pm versions. Specifically, for any given user, all machines that he uses must be managed by the same version of Pm. Otherwise, older versions of Pm will just ignore the new feature directories, and will make changes in the v1 or v2 directories without making corresponding changes in the feature directories. Result: a corrupt profile – precisely what Pm is supposed to avoid!
The first step in solving this problem is that we’ll be providing compatibility flags in the configuration of all future versions of Pm. If Pm v3 (say) can’t find a configured compatibility flag, it reverts to the Pm v2 functional level. Similarly, if the flag is turned off, it operates at the Pm v2 functional level. So it’s OK to install newer versions of Pm over the top of older versions – they’ll work correctly. Likewise, the configuration of Pm v3 will be designed to be a superset of Pm v2, so you can replace the v2 ADM template with a v3 ADM template and Pm v2 will continue to operate correctly. (BTW, you’re probably better off removing INI files, they could cause problems. My personal opinion is that INI files and production farms don’t mix.)
There are two difficulties:
- AD changes don’t propagate through the forest instantaneously, so we have to avoid the situation where some instances of Pm v3 have been told they can now operate at Pm v3 level, while others haven’t seen the group policy update and continue to operate at Pm v2 level.
- You can’t (in general) be sure that you’ve found and updated every copy of Pm v2 to Pm v3, so regardless of what group policy says, some copies of Pm can only operate at Pm v2 level
There are two obvious ways around this problem. Neither solution is particularly elegant (so we’re working on improvements), but these give the flavour of how to do it.
The first is applicable in small networks, where you be sure that you’ve managed to upgrade every machine.
- Replace the Pm v2 ADM template in the GPO with the new Pm v3 template. Set the compatibility flag to off (0)
- Upgrade all machines to Pm v3
- Make whatever other changes you need to migrate (as per Pm v3 administrator guide)
- At a scheduled maintenance period, log everybody off
- Make the necessary configuration changes and set the compatibility flag to 1
- Wait for the group policy changes to propagate – maybe run gpupdate on each machine to force the update
- Let everybody log on again, and watch the fun.
Hmm, that might work in a small network, but you don’t have much of a backup plan if it goes wrong. It’s a “Big Bang” approach.
There’s another way, which gives you a bit more safety, and makes it easier to revert if something goes wrong. It makes use of the processed user group feature of Pm.
The idea is to create a new OU to contain all machines that have been upgraded to Pm v3 and a new group which contains the all the users allowed to use those machines. Initially the OU is empty and the group has no members.
(The OU will most likely be a set of OUs, covering each of the different OS types, but we’ll keep it simple for now. We’ll call that OU “V2OU”)
Step 1: If you have not already done so, ensure that all the users of the Pm v2 machines belong to a group, and configure this group as the processed group in the Pm v2 configuration. Let’s call that group “V2Users”
Step 2: Create a “mini-farm” in the new OU. We’ll call that new OU “V3OU” – again it could be several OUs, but we’re keeping it simple. You could move some unused machines from V2OU into V3OU, or you could build fresh machines. Ensure that V2Users are directed to machines in V2OU, and V3Users are directed into V3OU (this will involve some XA / XD changes outside the scope of this article). Install and configure Pm v3 on all the machines in the mini-farm, with the v3 feature level enabled. For this OU, make the processed group V3Users.
Step 3: Now you can migrate your first department of users. Get them all to log off and remove them from V2Users. Back up their profiles.
Step 4: Add them into V3Users and ensure that their sessions are now directed to V3OU.
Step 5: Let the users from the first department log on. Pm v3 will migrate their profiles on-the-fly to the new structure.
Step 6: Having transferred some users out of V2OU, you should now have a bit of spare capacity in V2OU. Transfer some more machines out of V2OU, upgrade them from Pm v2 to Pm v3, and transfer them in to V3OU. Migrate your next department (steps 3-5)
Step 7: Repeat step 6 above until all machines and all users are using Pm v3.
Hopefully there weren’t any problems with that. You migrated your users in small batches and if a problem did show up, you could revert that department to their backed-up profiles until you could fix the problem.